When mergers have been
agreed, the delegates must take the resolutions to the Approval
Panel. The Approval Panel will determine whether it
is
to be formally debated. If the resolution is not approved
for formal debate, the students will have to correct it
according to the Approval Panel¡¦s instructions and submit it again. No resolution can be formally debated unless the Approval Panel has
approved it. The criteria for approval of a resolution will
be:
- Format (see sample resolution);
- Language (grammar, lexis, orthography,
punctuation);
- Logical consistency.
The Panel will not presume
to make judgments about the content of the resolutions, nor
does ¡§approval¡¨ imply that the resolution is ¡§in order¡¨ according to the rules
and procedures of the particular forum. The Approval Panel will function as
follows:
Delegates must come to the lobbying time period with
both the resolutions on disk and hard copies. There
will be a computer room for finalizing resolutions, open
only during this time period. Only two delegates per resolution may work at a computer.
There will be folders at the front desk of the
approval room, one per committee. The resolutions
in these folders will be given to faculty members for
proofing.
Resolutions will be immediately rejected if they do
not have at least six submitters, if they exceed
two pages (unless it is vital for the resolution to be longer) and if they are
not in the correct UN format.
Only resolutions approved by the Approval Panel and
with the signature of a TAIMUN Director or an
appointee will be formally debated. The official resolutions will
be printed in the resolution books (one per committee) and distributed
for debate.
Steps to follow for the
approval of a resolution:
Bring one copy of the resolution to the approval
panel;
Leave the resolution at the front desk, where it
will receive a committee number and a letter;
Come back to the front desk about 30 minutes later
to see if the resolution has been read and approved;
If the resolution needs corrections, take it back to
the computer rooms and make the necessary
corrections;
Bring the corrected resolution and the original copy
back to the front desk of the approval panel;
Come back to the front desk about 30 minutes later
to see if the corrected resolution has been read and
approved. If it needs more corrections, take it to the computer lab. If it has
been approved, it will remain in the approval panel. It will be
photocopied and distributed to the delegates on day 2;
Closing time for the approval panel is _____, by
which time all corrected drafts must have been
submitted for final approval.
The discussions that will
take place later at the conference will focus on the meaning of the
resolution¡¦s key terms, and its usefulness in solving the problem in a way that is most acceptable to the parties involved and to the
international community, which must support the solution.
Thus, all resolutions that have come before the
Committee will have been brought to the attention of the delegates in the lobbying process and through the efforts of the chair in calling ad
hoc meetings to facilitate the merger process. The goal of
the discussion should be to achieve consensus so that
the version finally adopted represents the opinion or will of the vast majority of the delegates in the forum.
AMENDMENTS
All amendments must be
submitted to the Chair, at the appropriate time during formal
debate, on an Amendment Sheet of the approved format (see Sample Amendment
Sheet). A separate Amendment Sheet must be used for each amendment or amendment to an amendment. All amendments must state
clearly:
- the line or
lines in which the amendment is to be made;
- the clauses
which are affected by the amendment;
- the kind of
amendment, e.g. strike, insert, strike and insert, add.
Amendments may be
handwritten but must be legible. Illegible or untidy amendments will
be ruled out of order.
SAMPLE RESOLUTION
COMMITTEE: 2nd
Committee
QUESTION OF:
THE TAIMUN ASSEMBLY,
(1) Reaffirming the special responsibility of the United Nations toward the conflict
(2) in
(3) Recalling that the present impasse is marked by an inability on the part of the
(4) two sides to negotiate,
(5) Fully believing that peaceful and friendly relations based on respect, self
(6) determination and equal rights for all peoples be guaranteed,
(7) Aware of the present difficulties caused by the lack of trust and contact between
(8) the two communities,
(9) Viewing with appreciation the efforts of the United Nations Peacekeeping
(10) Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP), established in 1964, in maintaining peace and order
(11) between the Greek and Turkish communities,
(12) Noting with deep concern the lack of financial support given to the United
(13) Nations
peacekeeping forces in
(14) problem,
(15) Acknowledging the fundamental right to self-determination of the people of
(16)
(17) Emphasizing the need for direct, comprehensive negotiations and on-going
(18) political
dialogue between the two communities,
(19) Noting with approval the Secretary General's commitment to a peaceful and
(20) just solution,
(21) 1. Urges that there be no military
interference by any
(22)
conflict of
(23) 2. Suggests:
(24) (a) the
withdrawal of all foreign troops, excluding
(25) which will act as a peacekeeping force along with UNFICYP,
(26)
from the island by
(27) monthly assessments,
(28) (b) that the police forces be controlled at cantonal levels, and thus
(29) manned by people indigenous to that area,
(30) (c) the establishment of a federation of cantons, half of them in
(31) territory actually controlled by Turkish Cypriots, with each
(32) canton having its own internal authority,
(33) (d) the adoption of a constitution which includes a bicameral
(34) parliament with one chamber in which every canton is equally
(35) represented and another in which seventy percent of the
(36) members are elected in the cantons actually controlled by the
(37) Greek Cypriots, leaving a veto power to the unanimity of the
(38) other cantons,
(39) (e) the founding of a federal supreme court comprising three Greek
(40) and three Turkish Cypriots and one neutral judge appointed by
(41) the upper body of the cantonal parliament,